But he’s also indicated he’s doing ART for his own interests. No worries nor negative implications there. Alberto is from all indications a superb, responsive developer and seriously nice guy. At this point my relative lack of motivation to seriously go after ART is two-fold:ĪRT is a one-developer show. That causes annoying (but ultimately not insurmountable) issues with a RawTherapee workflow.Ī disadvantage of darktable is, it’s slower.Īnd then (on-topic!) there’s ART, which fully handles CR3 metadata and is apparently a bit simpler to use than RT. XnView MP and / or Fast Stone do everything I need WRT browsing, managing, etc.Īn advantage darktable has over RawTherapee is full support of CR3 metadata. Yes, darktable has DAM capabilities… but I simply don’t need nor use them. It’s not like I have these world-beater photos just screaming to linearly processed… (and I see lots of good results from other editors) But truthfully, my level is so far below that strata that it’s only one small factor of many when it comes to the final image. From what I understand that’s a Good Thing. Yes, darktable has a linear / scene-referred workflow. But if I look at it objectively I’m not sure why… Yet darktable is statistically where I spend most of my raw time. To my eye the three sort of sit at different places in the FOSS raw editor continuum:ĪRT: easier to use, power is under the hood - RawTherapee: more dials and gauges but they look familiar - darktable: align the dilithium crystals and clear spacedock, Mr. But to add to my confusion after two abortive dalliances, I invested time in darktable. I’ve poked around in ART but not invested serious time (yet). Not that I’m a master but I’m not totally lost. When I started shooting again after getting a new camera in late 2020 (I shot a bit in the mid-2000s), I invested time learning RawTherapee.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |